Public Perceptions of AI and Human Enhancement Technologies: Understanding Views, Constraints, and Potential Impacts
Overall, the Pew Research Center survey on Americans’ views about artificial intelligence and human enhancement technologies reveals a complex landscape of opinions and concerns. While many see promise in the potential benefits of these technologies, such as improving daily life and human abilities, caution and uncertainty also run through public views.
The survey found that Americans are more positive than negative about the use of facial recognition technology by police and algorithms by social media companies to find false information. However, there is more caution around the use of computer chip implants in the brain and autonomous passenger vehicles.
Concerns about autonomy, unintended consequences, economic disparities, and social equity are prevalent in public views. Many believe that these technologies could worsen economic disparities and lead to increased surveillance of certain groups. Additionally, there are worries about the impact on society and the potential for these technologies to be used for greed and power rather than the greater good.
The survey also highlighted the importance of setting higher standards for testing and regulating these technologies. Americans overwhelmingly support the idea of higher standards for testing driverless cars, brain chip implants, gene editing, and robotic exoskeletons.
Partisan divisions were also evident in the survey, with Republicans more concerned about government overreach in regulating these technologies, while Democrats worry more about insufficient oversight.
Overall, the survey paints a nuanced picture of public views on artificial intelligence and human enhancement technologies, showing a mix of excitement, concern, and uncertainty. As these technologies continue to develop and become more integrated into society, it will be crucial to address these concerns and ensure that they are used ethically and responsibly for the benefit of all.